History of the AEA Graduate Student & New Evaluators TIG

- 1999 -

 

BACKGROUND ON THE AEA GSA

At the 1998 AEA Conference, some interest was expressed in establishing an AEA Graduate Student Association. A list was circulated at the AEA Board's Student Reception, and signed by 33 conference attendees.
At the same time, David Bernstein organized a Doctoral Roundtable, the purpose of which was to allow doctoral students, faculty, and recent post-doctorates an opportunity to network and discuss their research interests. He felt it would be in AEA's best interest to foster and encourage doctoral student networking and participation, since doctoral students are a major potential contributor to the enhancement of evaluation practice and theory . With a rather large percentage of AEA's membership employed in academia, Mr. Bernstein thought the Doctoral Roundtable might, as a permanent organization, encourage and promote the benefits of long-term membership in AEA, and provide the Association with a focus for developing the next generation of evaluation academics. A second annual AEA Doctoral Roundtable is scheduled.

THE AEA GRADUATE STUDENT ASSOCIATION IS ESTABLISHED

In February 1999, the Board of the American Evaluation Association (AEA) unanimously endorsed establishment of an AEA Graduate Student Association (AEA GSA). The intent of this group is to develop activities for, and represent the interests of, AEA members who are completing graduate degrees. The AEA Board asked Charles Thomas (AEA Board Member and faculty member, George Mason University) to be the Board's liaison to the AEA GSA. Bob Covert (former AEA President and faculty member, University of Virginia) also expressed interest in the group, and is especially interested in an electronic listserv or bulletin board to support doctoral students that are A.B.D. (All But Dissertation, a.k.a. Almost But-never-completely Done).
The mission , scope , purpose, and activities of the AEA GSA is continuing to evolve. By Laws have been drafted, distributed to the AEA GSA Board of Directors for comment, and will soon be submitted to the AEA Board of Directors for Approval. At the AEA Conference in Orlando in November 1999, an AEA GSA Board of Directors was established, and officers were elected.

ORGANIZATIONAL ISSUES/LEADERSHIP

At the urging of Charles Thomas, a 1999 AEA Conference concurrent session to organize the AEA GSA was conducted. The 40 or so attending members voted to approve establishment of a Board of Directors.

1) AEA Board of Directors: A six member Board of Directors was elected by graduate students in attendance at the concurrent session. As approved, the Board is as follows:
Chair: Liesel Ritchie
Chair-Elect: Catherine Elwell
Past Chair: David Bernstein
Program Co-Chairs: Deborah Wasserman, Kerry Kriener-Althen
EVALGRAD Coordinator: Jane Davidson
The Executive Committee (Chair, Chair Elect, and Past Chair) met following the concurrent session, and agreed that the Chair-Elect will serve as Co-Chair.
Responsibilities of the Board and terms of office will be established in the By Laws, once approved by the AEA Board of Directors.

2) Members: All AEA members (both those with student memberships and those who might be full AEA members) should be given an opportunity to join and get on the e-mail list (EVALGRAD).

3) Mission/Purpose/TIG Status: In order to gain some visibility within AEA, a Mission Statement for the AEA GSA has been developed, and will be included in the By Laws: The mission of the AEA Graduate Student Association is to develop activities for, and represent the interests of, AEA members who are completing graduate degrees. The intent is to foster communication and networking between graduate students, interested faculty, recent post-graduates, potential employers, and other AEA members who wish to support the interests of AEA members who are graduate students. It is believed that these activities will:

• expand knowledge and awareness of AEA, its mission, and active use of the Guiding Principles for Evaluators, and lead to growth of the American Evaluation Association;
• provide heightened visibility for the evaluation profession;
• encourage diversity in the American Evaluation Association; and
• foster increased interest in the evaluation field .

Possible TIG Status: It may be that the best way to organize the GSA would be to apply for Topical Interest Group status. This would require development of a mission statement, require an annual meeting, and perhaps give us access to otherwise as yet unseen AEA resources ($$$) to support AEA GSA activities. For the time being, this idea will continue to be discussed pending AEA Board approval of the By Laws.
[Update: In February, the AEA Board passed a motion that gives official recognition to the AEA Graduate Student Association. After much discussion about how this could be accomplished under the current bylaws, it was the unanimous decision of the Board that it would be prudent to pass the motion for recognition as a TIG, since this provision is already in place. Moreover, it immediately provides the GSA with the rights and privileges that currently exist for all TIGs. The Board also passed a motion that will reserve a place on the membership renewal or first time membership form that would enable the identification of graduate student status.]

4) Board Representation: Cathy Elwell (Utah State University) indicated that she talked to AEA President Scriven at AEA's conference in San Diego about including a student representative on the Board. This has not happened yet, but might once the AEA GSA is officially recognized and its mission and organization is approved.

5) EVALGRAD Management: EVALGRAD was established thanks to the efforts of AEA President Scriven and Jane Davidson at Claremont Graduate University. Jane Davidson agreed to continue to serve as the EVALGRAD Coordinator, and was thereby elected to the AEA GSA Board. Some issues of management of the list should be addressed, such as whether the list will be moderated or not, and whether list membership will be limited to AEA and/or AEA GSA members. To subscribe, new subscribers should send an e-mail to LISTSERV@ACAD.CGU.EDU and in the body of the message, type: subscribe evalgrad Firstname Lastname.

6) 1999 AEA CONFERENCE GSA ACTIVITIES

A. AEA GSA Organizing Session: Friday, November 5, 1999 11:10 a.m. to 11:55 a.m., in Salon 5

B. SESSION 580: DOCTORAL ROUNDTABLE/PANEL: Friday, November 5 from 3:20 to 4:50, in Salon 23. Developing and Completing a Doctoral Dissertation
Chair: David J. Bernstein, Doctoral Candidate (ABD), George Washington
University & Evaluation Manager, Montgomery County, MD Finance Dept. Professors Nick Smith (Syracuse), Charles Thomas (George Mason), and Bob Covert (Virginia) conducted a panel for 1/2 the session, with the second 1/2 of the session dedicated to informal discussions about doctoral student dissertation and research interests.

C. SESSION 560: 90 MINUTE CREATIVE FORMAT SALON 23, Friday, November 5 1999, 1:40 p.m. to 3:10 p.m. Footsteps in the Quicksand: Is the Foundation Solid? Chair: Hallie Preskill, University of New Mexico
Presenters: Footsteps in the Quicksand: A Beginner's View of Evaluation,
Kate Mulqueen, University of New Mexico
Barbra Zuckerman, University of New Mexico
Walt Gilmore, University of New Mexico Evaluation Training Programs: Is the Foundation Solid?
Nancy Puhlmann, Utah State University
Louise R. Moulding, Utah State University
Ken Wareham, Utah State University

D. AEA Board Graduate Student Reception
Friday, November 5, probably around 9PM. A graduate student reception Friday evening was held in the AEA President’s Conference Suite. The reception appeared to be quite well attended.

Prepared by: David J. Bernstein, AEA GSA Past Chair
Doctoral Candidate (ABD), The George Washington University and
Evaluation Manager, Montgomery County, Maryland Department of Finance david.bernstein@co.mo.md.us
January 18, 2000

- 2000 -

 

The GSA sponsored a number of activities for the Evaluation 2000 meeting in Honolulu, Hawaii.

1. TIG meeting

2. Mentoring:Kerry Kriener-Althen coordinated this panel.
Several AEA evaluators who have experience mentoring students and young professionals have volunteered to participate. (see list below). As you can see, we have a nice mix of univerisity, non-university-public, and non-university-private experienced mentors.
Mentoring Panel participants:
• Eunice Rodriquez, Asst. Professor, Dept. of Policy Analysis and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
• Jack McKillip, Applied Research Consultants, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL
• Martha Tompkins, Assessment Specialist, Office of Accountability, Virginia Beach City Public Schools
• Cliff Carr, small businessman and evaluation consultant , Los Angelos, CA
• Doug Hoy, Director of Evaluation Research , National Museum of Science and Technology, Ottawa, ON
• Vicky Wells, Epidemiologist, Institute for Health Policy and Health Services Research, Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH

3. Networking: Deborah Wasserman coordinated this activity. Initial ideas:
As coordinator of the networking event at the conference this year, I want to launch an idea for discussion:
I'm thinking that rather than a panel, it would be helpful to establish a type of appointment clearing house whereby grad students could submit names of researchers/evaluators with whom they'd like to meet along with the specific topic of the discussion. We could function sort of like the job bank by arranging meetings between parties. I imagine the first step in the process would be to ask grad students to submit names of professionals they are interested in meeting and the specific topic of their interest. If there is a high demand for one person's attention, as a clearing house we might look toward setting up ad-hoc mini sessions; or at least get a good idea for a session at the following year's conference. The second step would be to contact the identified professionals for times they may have available (even brief 15-minute slots) during the conference. Perhaps we might also have a sign-up book at the registration desk at the conference. I'm considering that networking is a two-way street and that making contacts with new and upcoming talent is often equally as valuable for established professionals as vice versa.

4. Dissertation roundtable: Carolyn Sullins and David Bernstein will coordinate this panel.

5. Advancing the discipline: Evaluation journal editors discuss ways of building our knowledge base (an idea submitted by James Reidel): Jane Davidson chaired this panel.
Because evaluation is a young discipline, evaluators are often trained primarily within fields such as the social sciences, rather than in evaluation per se. Accordingly, they may receive little guidance about contributing specifically to evaluation journals (as opposed to journals within their own fields). This panel brings together editors from four evaluation journals, and asks: (1) What does your journal look for that differs from what other journals (both within and outside evaluation) require? (2) What types of articles do you and your editors wish for but never see submitted? (3) Where are the gaps and opportunities for the new generation of evaluators to inject some innovation into the evaluation literature? It is hoped that this session will not only encourage some of the field 's new minds to start making a contribution , but will also highlight areas where contributions would be particularly valuable for expanding the discipline's knowledge base.
Contributors:
• Melvin M. Mark (American Journal of Evaluation)
• Jennifer C. Greene (New Directions for Evaluation)
• Jonathan A. Morell (Evaluation and Program Planning)
• David Nevo (Studies in Educational Evaluation ) - unable to attend

6. Career choices: who's doing what and how did they get there: ): If this session is to take place, it needs a coordinator. ANYONE WANT TO TAKE THIS ON? PLEASE REPLY TO WASSERMAN.12@OSU.EDU

- 2004 -

Graduate Student & New Evaluators Topical Interest Group
Business Meeting Agenda, AEA at Atlanta
Thursday, November 4, 2004, 11:05 am – 12:35 pm

 

A. Welcome

B. Introduction of Current Officers

Jeannine Voutta, Past Chair: We would like to thank Jeannine for her efforts as TIG Chair and discharge her from her duties.

Cady Berkel, Chair

Xiaofan Cai , Chair-Elect

Roshni Menon, Program Co-Chair

Bianca Montrosse, Program Co-Chair

Andrea Smith, Mentoring Subcommittee Co-Representative

Randi Nelson, Mentoring Subcommittee Co-Representative

Daniela Schröter, Publicity Co-Chair

Patrick Serumola, Publicity Co-Chair

C. Activities Report

Publicity (Daniela Schröter)

D. Sessions

Sponsored Sessions

What makes a good evaluation? (Wed. 4:30-6:00)

How do I get a job in your organization? Advice to those seeking careers in various evaluation fields (Thurs., 9:25-10:55)

Submitting to the AEA conference: Advice from the Graduate Student & New Evaluator , Qualitative, Evaluation Use, Crime and Justice, and Quantitative TIGs (Thur., 1:40-3:10)

Sharing our practice stories: Storytelling to improve our evaluation practice (Fri., 9:25-10:10)

Building professional capacity: Developing evaluators for the future (Fri., 10:20-11:50)

Differential roles in evaluative decision making (Fri., 3:35-5:05)

Team building for evaluators II (Fri., 5:15-6:00)

Navigating the evaluation terrain: Lessons learned (Sat., 11:05-12:35)

Redesign my evaluation? Lessons learned from year 1 data (Sat., 12:45-1:30)

Getting published in evaluation: what are journal editors looking for (Sat., 1:40-3:10)

D. Next year’s submissions? Is there something you would like to see?

E. Listserves and Website

EvalGrad Listserv and Archives: http://evaluation.wmich.edu/archives/evalgrad.html

Evaltalk: http://bama.ua.edu/archives/evaltalk.html

Graduate Student and New Evaluator TIG Official Website http://evaluation.wmich.edu/evalgrad/index.html

Many other tigs have listserves which you can find by going to http://www.eval.org/EvaluationLinks/Listservs.htm

F. Announcements

American Evaluation Association/Duquesne University Graduate Education Diversity

Internship Program (Prisca Moeti Collins)

Volunteering

Information for Toronto ‘05 will be posted on the AEA website (www.eval.org)

President’s Reception (open to all students & new evaluators)
Wednesday, November 3, 8-9 pm in the Crystal Ballroom. Hosted by the AEA President and Board, it is a chance to connect with other students and the AEA leadership, have great snacks, and enjoy a drink on AEA.

G. Future Directions? Any Suggestions for Our TIG?

H. Description of officer positions:

Chair

Program Chair

Publicity Chair/Committee

AEA Conference Evaluation Committee

Mentoring Committee Representative

Student Ambassador

Other ideas?

E. Elections